|
Technical projects |
||||
|
|
||||
| 263 GHz spectrometer |
2007-..., Bruker
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Spectrometer Manager |
2002-2007,
ETH
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
2003-2007, ETH
|
||||
This is next generation of the acquisition system for epr@ETH. PCI bus
is chosen as a system integration bus and recent PCI boards are selected
to fit the most demanding tasks in pulse EPR. Those include 2 GS/s real
time averager from Acqiris. It has dual-input with tunable gain and offset,
500 MHz bandwidth and it's able to accumulate up to 64k traces at once.
Two AWG boards from Chase Scientific provide four RF channels and 12 pulse
channels. The system is controlled by SpecMan.
Recent poster
(Denver, 2003). 3.01.04. |
||||
|
|
||||
| X-band II |
2001-2006, ETH
|
|||
Open
for users in 2005. This spectrometer is a renovated version of the ETH-type
pulse X-band instrument. For the latter see T. Waker PhD thesis for technical
details. I have used this instrument to develop pulse programmer, control
system II and SpecMan. Finally I completed the installation and rebuild
mw part in a way more convenient for users. Currently Xband II is operational,
able to make HYSCORE or ENDOR experiments faster than E580 from Bruker
BioSpin. In the ENDOR case stochastic RF sweep, passive RF leveling and
others useful features are available. A little things left to do there
is to swap pulse programmers between this instrument and S-band spectrometer
which I put under SpecMan control as well (cw only at the moment). With
Jörg Forrer and Rene Tschaggelar. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
1999-2003, ETH
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
1999-2003, ETH
|
||||
For the beginning the probe-head was designed to overcome the main disadvantages
of the ER5106-QTE probe-head (Bruker BioSpin) - small sample size and
a little bit low P-to-B1 conversion factor. The goal was reached (3.8
mm tubes, 5 ns pi/2 with 40 W incident power and strongly overcoupled
cavity) and since year 2000 a lot of experiments, including matching or
decoupling, were made by my colleagues using this probe. Look on Schweiger's
group publications, take one where Ka-band (aka Q-band) is mentioned,
most probably this probe was exploited. Then cw and ENDOR options were
included. At the end the probe-head almost as easy in use as Bruker's
one, it has better sensitivity and stronger B1 at the same power; ENDOR
performance is weaker than ER5106 has, but note that in last case the
conversion B2/Prf is extremely high! The people who was/is involved in
the projects: toolmakers Willi Groth (retired recently) and Barbara Feuer
(who take the baton) and electronics engineer Jörg Forrer who gave
many valuable suggestions for the design. Recent poster
(Portoroz, 2003). 3.01.2004. Finally I have published a paper
because Arthur asked me many times about. |
||||
|
|
||||
| Ka-band II |
1998-2002, ETH
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
||||
| W-band probe head |
1997-1998, WIS
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
1997-1998, WIS
|
||||
I really enjoy a time in the lab of Daniella Goldfarb,
including the time to assemble and run W-band spectrometer. The mw bridge
(http://www.elva-1.com)
and the probe-head are from V. Krymov. For further details look here
or there.
3.10.03
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
1997-1998, WIS
|
||||
Here my job was to teach students how to do ENDOR on X-band. And I earned a good experience in conventional and advanced ENDOR. There were of course some technical problems I was dealing with. Here I was working with two spectrometer control programs one from ETH, written by J.M. Fauth, and another one, known as "Jaap's program", written by Jaap Shane. I was maintaining the latter. Some examples, as well as spectrometer description you can find here. With Daniella Goldfard. 3.10.03 |
||||
|
|
||||
| Control system I |
1989-1992, KSU
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
1990-1995, KSU
|
||||
My
first spectrometer was a 35 GHz pulse EPR apparatus. Home-made in full
sense of this word. I'm not only assembled the mw components but also
fixed some of them and built all analog control circuits of the pulse
bridge as well as construct whole control system (see above). The spectrometer
was made using solid state mw components only. No klystrons, no tubes.
It has three mw sources, two are 50 mW cw Gunn oscillators and third one
is pulsed IMPATT oscillator based on two silicon double drift diodes.
The frequency of the first Gunn was voltage controlled (varactor) and
this source was used for a probe-head tuning. The second Gunn is one of
most stable free running mw sources (no DR, no external thermostabilization,
only a diode camera , stabilizing cavity and isolator) I ever seen. It
was used for cw in absorption mode and saturation recovery measurements.
The key component is the pulse IMPATT oscillator. Two diodes ( p-p+-n+-n
) were fixed in coaxial lines and then placed at certain positions in
a section of WR28 waveguide. By proper adjustment of the diode positions
and an amplitude and a shape of the current pulses applied to the diodes
I was able to reach 2 W power with the negligible frequency chirp. There
are many others beautiful components inside, some details are mentioned
there.
Rafail (left bottom) and Yurii (probably making this photo) built even
a loop-gap resonator for 35 GHz. 3.10.03 |
||||
|
Send your comments and questions
to
|
||||